Danger - slippery law
Helps, D.
Danger - slippery law - 2000 - Building 265(8136) 12 May 2000, 62-63(2) .
Discusses Judge Toulmin's decision in "Bloor Construction v Bowmer & Kirkland", how this illustrates the implied 'slip' rule in adjudication, and the gaps it reveals in the current Construction Act.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
BLOOR CONSTRUCTION V BOWMER AND KIRKLAND
BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
FW COOK V SHIMIZU
HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
SLIP RULE
Danger - slippery law - 2000 - Building 265(8136) 12 May 2000, 62-63(2) .
Discusses Judge Toulmin's decision in "Bloor Construction v Bowmer & Kirkland", how this illustrates the implied 'slip' rule in adjudication, and the gaps it reveals in the current Construction Act.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
BLOOR CONSTRUCTION V BOWMER AND KIRKLAND
BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
FW COOK V SHIMIZU
HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
SLIP RULE