Back to Latham
Bessey, J.
Back to Latham - 2000 - Building (27) 7 July 2000, 73(1) .
Argues that adjudication is failing one of its key criteria of improving site relations. Suggests that this is because the present adjudication process does not follow all the recommendations, for resolving potential conflicts, of the Latham report. For example pre-pricing variations agreed by both parties as to cost and programme implications.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
PRE-PRICING VARIATIONS
LATHAM REFORMS
MEDIATION
CONCILIATION
Back to Latham - 2000 - Building (27) 7 July 2000, 73(1) .
Argues that adjudication is failing one of its key criteria of improving site relations. Suggests that this is because the present adjudication process does not follow all the recommendations, for resolving potential conflicts, of the Latham report. For example pre-pricing variations agreed by both parties as to cost and programme implications.
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
PRE-PRICING VARIATIONS
LATHAM REFORMS
MEDIATION
CONCILIATION