Conditional security for business tenancies
Smith, P
Conditional security for business tenancies - 2000 - Rent Review and Lease Renewal September(3), 123-131(5) .
Considers the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II in the context of landlord opposition to new tenancy. The landlord of premises held on a business tenancy can oppose new tenancy if he has clear intention to demolish or reconstruct the premises, or occupy them for business or personal use. Investigates the intention issue in detail, with reference to "Aberdeen Steak Houses Group Ltd v Crown Estate Commissioners' and other recent case law. Highlights the difference between 'desire' and 'intention', and looks at the intention and real chance tests. Case law
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
NEW TENANCIES
DEMOLITION
RECONSTRUCTION
COPPIN AND OTHERS V BRUCE-SMITH
ABERDEEN STEAK HOUSES GROUP LTD V CROWN ESTATE COMMISSIONERS
CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V MCCARTHY & STONE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
INTENTION TEST
INTENTION
Conditional security for business tenancies - 2000 - Rent Review and Lease Renewal September(3), 123-131(5) .
Considers the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II in the context of landlord opposition to new tenancy. The landlord of premises held on a business tenancy can oppose new tenancy if he has clear intention to demolish or reconstruct the premises, or occupy them for business or personal use. Investigates the intention issue in detail, with reference to "Aberdeen Steak Houses Group Ltd v Crown Estate Commissioners' and other recent case law. Highlights the difference between 'desire' and 'intention', and looks at the intention and real chance tests. Case law
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II
NEW TENANCIES
DEMOLITION
RECONSTRUCTION
COPPIN AND OTHERS V BRUCE-SMITH
ABERDEEN STEAK HOUSES GROUP LTD V CROWN ESTATE COMMISSIONERS
CADOGAN AND ANOTHER V MCCARTHY & STONE DEVELOPMENTS LTD
INTENTION TEST
INTENTION