Still no answer: third party damage and the legal black hole
Wallace, I.
Still no answer: third party damage and the legal black hole - 2001 - Construction Law Reports 18(1) January 2001, 113-121(9) .
Argues that the decision of the HL in "Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd" (2000) does not help resolve the significant issues of contract and third party damage raised by that case. Considers the central issue of the Alfred McAlpine case, which was the proper measure of damage where a party in breach of a contract fails to supply promised goods and services to the recipient who's willing to pay for them.
ALFRED MCALPINE CONSTRUCTION LTD V PANATOWN LTD
THIRD PARTY
BREACH OF CONTRACT
BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
MEASURE OF DAMAGES
CASE LAW
Still no answer: third party damage and the legal black hole - 2001 - Construction Law Reports 18(1) January 2001, 113-121(9) .
Argues that the decision of the HL in "Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd" (2000) does not help resolve the significant issues of contract and third party damage raised by that case. Considers the central issue of the Alfred McAlpine case, which was the proper measure of damage where a party in breach of a contract fails to supply promised goods and services to the recipient who's willing to pay for them.
ALFRED MCALPINE CONSTRUCTION LTD V PANATOWN LTD
THIRD PARTY
BREACH OF CONTRACT
BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
MEASURE OF DAMAGES
CASE LAW