Intents and purposes
Intents and purposes
- 2001
- Estates Gazette (0116) 21 April 2001, 143(1) .
Discusses the CA decision in "JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham" where the ruling that gave Graham title to development land was overturned because continuing use of land was not regarded as clear evidence of intention to possess. The decision also confirmed that the law on adverse possession is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998.
SQUATTERS
ADVERSE POSSESSION
JA PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
LAND OWNERSHIP
Discusses the CA decision in "JA Pye (Oxford) Ltd v Graham" where the ruling that gave Graham title to development land was overturned because continuing use of land was not regarded as clear evidence of intention to possess. The decision also confirmed that the law on adverse possession is not incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998.
SQUATTERS
ADVERSE POSSESSION
JA PYE (OXFORD) LTD V GRAHAM
HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
LAND OWNERSHIP