A trouble shared
Briggs, L.
A trouble shared - 2001 - Estates Gazette (0122) 2 June 2001, 144-145(2) .
Highlights some of the issues surrounding co-location, whereby occupiers share a building for IT-related purposes. Tenants should ensure that the arrangement is properly recognised as a tenancy so that it cannot be terminated during the fixed term by notice, whilst landlords wishing to ensure flexibility or to avoid exclusive possession should include a declaration that the agreement is a licence rather than a tenancy to exclude it from the Landlord and Tennant Act 1954. Notes that co-location facilities fall outside the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 and that consequently planning consent will be required for a change of use to co-location.
AGREEMENTS
CO-LOCATION CENTRES
CO-LOCATION FACILITIES
DRESDEN ESTATES LTD V COLLINSON
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
LICENCES
TELEHOTELS
TENANCIES
TENANCY AGREEMENTS
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (USE CLASSES) ORDER 1987
A trouble shared - 2001 - Estates Gazette (0122) 2 June 2001, 144-145(2) .
Highlights some of the issues surrounding co-location, whereby occupiers share a building for IT-related purposes. Tenants should ensure that the arrangement is properly recognised as a tenancy so that it cannot be terminated during the fixed term by notice, whilst landlords wishing to ensure flexibility or to avoid exclusive possession should include a declaration that the agreement is a licence rather than a tenancy to exclude it from the Landlord and Tennant Act 1954. Notes that co-location facilities fall outside the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 and that consequently planning consent will be required for a change of use to co-location.
AGREEMENTS
CO-LOCATION CENTRES
CO-LOCATION FACILITIES
DRESDEN ESTATES LTD V COLLINSON
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
LICENCES
TELEHOTELS
TENANCIES
TENANCY AGREEMENTS
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (USE CLASSES) ORDER 1987