Landlord and tenant: lease enfranchisement
Landlord and tenant: lease enfranchisement
- 2001
- Estates Gazette [2001] 25 EG 158 (CS) (23/06/01) .
"Penman v Upavon Enterprises Ltd", CA 13 June 2001. Responding to tenants (P) serving a lease enfranchisement notice, landlord (U) served a counternotice requiring that an indemnity covenant should be included in the conveyance. The leasehold valuation tribunal determined the price to be paid but failed to mention the terms of the conveyance including the indemnity covenant. The parties failed to reach an agreement about the remaining terms. P applied for a vesting order which was subsequently dismissed on U's appeal. P appealed contending the tribunal's decision had been a final decision of the issues. Appeal dismissed on the grounds that the tribunal's decision could not be final with respect to what it had not decided.
LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
PENMAN V UPAVON ENTERPRISES LTD
LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL
"Penman v Upavon Enterprises Ltd", CA 13 June 2001. Responding to tenants (P) serving a lease enfranchisement notice, landlord (U) served a counternotice requiring that an indemnity covenant should be included in the conveyance. The leasehold valuation tribunal determined the price to be paid but failed to mention the terms of the conveyance including the indemnity covenant. The parties failed to reach an agreement about the remaining terms. P applied for a vesting order which was subsequently dismissed on U's appeal. P appealed contending the tribunal's decision had been a final decision of the issues. Appeal dismissed on the grounds that the tribunal's decision could not be final with respect to what it had not decided.
LEASEHOLD REFORM, HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ACT 1993
LEASEHOLD ENFRANCHISEMENT
PENMAN V UPAVON ENTERPRISES LTD
LEASEHOLD VALUATION TRIBUNAL