Lead us not into error
Lead us not into error
- 2002
- Estates Gazette (0211) 16 March 2002, 151(1) .
The final article in a four part series discussing the law surrounding the validity of statutory notices and the inconsistency of CA rulings following "Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd". Examines the recent CA case "Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall" which queried the validity of a landlord's notice containing errors served under the Housing Act 1988 s20. Concludes that for errors in non-mandatory requirements, the "Manai" reasonable recipient test is likely to be appropriate.
EVIDENT ERROR
INVALID NOTICES
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
MANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
RAVENSEFT PROPERTIES LTD V HALL
STATUTORY NOTICES
The final article in a four part series discussing the law surrounding the validity of statutory notices and the inconsistency of CA rulings following "Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd". Examines the recent CA case "Ravenseft Properties Ltd v Hall" which queried the validity of a landlord's notice containing errors served under the Housing Act 1988 s20. Concludes that for errors in non-mandatory requirements, the "Manai" reasonable recipient test is likely to be appropriate.
EVIDENT ERROR
INVALID NOTICES
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
MANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
RAVENSEFT PROPERTIES LTD V HALL
STATUTORY NOTICES