Indecent proposals
Bingham, T
Indecent proposals - 2002 - Building 267(8229) 12 April 2002, 48-49(2) .
Looks at claims by unsuccessful parties to an adjudication to set-off the amount to be paid under the decision by sums owed to it by the successful party. Reviews "Robert McAlpine v Pring St Hill" (2001) where the contractor brought enforcement proceedings and in which the defendant subcontractor made a set-off claim. Highlights the subcontractor's argument on the requirements of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
ROBERT MCALPLINE V PRING ST HILL
HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
SET-OFF CLAIMS
SUBCONTRACTORS
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
Indecent proposals - 2002 - Building 267(8229) 12 April 2002, 48-49(2) .
Looks at claims by unsuccessful parties to an adjudication to set-off the amount to be paid under the decision by sums owed to it by the successful party. Reviews "Robert McAlpine v Pring St Hill" (2001) where the contractor brought enforcement proceedings and in which the defendant subcontractor made a set-off claim. Highlights the subcontractor's argument on the requirements of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
ROBERT MCALPLINE V PRING ST HILL
HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
SET-OFF CLAIMS
SUBCONTRACTORS
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION