A case of foot and mouth
Yule, I.
A case of foot and mouth - 2003 - Building 268(8308) 14 November 2003, 62(1) .
Advises parties involved in an adjudication dispute that, if they think an adjudicator has no right to decide a dispute, they should be careful what they say as they can lose the right to have the court overturn the result. It suggests parties should not submit to an adjudicator's jurisdictional decision,as they may not be able to appeal againstthe decision at a later date. This may be especially true in construction contracts.
BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
NORDOT ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD V SIEMANS PLC
A case of foot and mouth - 2003 - Building 268(8308) 14 November 2003, 62(1) .
Advises parties involved in an adjudication dispute that, if they think an adjudicator has no right to decide a dispute, they should be careful what they say as they can lose the right to have the court overturn the result. It suggests parties should not submit to an adjudicator's jurisdictional decision,as they may not be able to appeal againstthe decision at a later date. This may be especially true in construction contracts.
BUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
NORDOT ENGINEERING SERVICES LTD V SIEMANS PLC