Insolvency and resolution of construction contract disputes by adjudication in the UK construction industry
Ndekugri, Issaka
Insolvency and resolution of construction contract disputes by adjudication in the UK construction industry - 2005 - Construction Management and Economics 23(4) May 2005, 399-408(10) .
Presents a critical review of all the cases where the courts have dealt with the effects of insolvency on the right to adjudicate and the enforceability of adjudicators' decisions. Argues that the courts may decline to enforce an adjudicator's payment decision when it is concluded that the payee would be unable to make repayment; the only exception to this would occur when the other party is in administration.
LATHAM REFORMS
HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
INSOLVENCY ACT 1986
A STRAUME (UK) LTD V BRADLOR DEVELOPMENTS LTD
PARKE V FENTON GREEN PARTNERSHIP
GUARDI SHOES LTD V DATUM CONTRACTS
SEAWIND TANKERS CORPORATION V BAYOIL SA
RE A DEBTOR (NO 87 OF 1999)
MONTGOMERY V WANDA MODES LTD
HERSCHEL ENGINEERING LTD V BREEN PROPERTY LTD
ABSOLUTE RENTALS LTD V GENCOR ENTERPRISES LTD
NIKKO HOTELS (UK) LTD V MEPC PLC
RAINFORD HOUSE LTD V CADOGAN LTD
ISOVEL CONTRACTS LTD V ABB BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES LTD
SL TIMBER SYSTEMS LTD V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD
HIGHLAND COUNCIL FOR SUSPENSION OF A CHARGE FOR PAYMENT OF MONEY AND SUSPENSION AD INTERIM
THIRD PARTIES (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 1930
GALLIFORD UK LTD V MARKEL CAPITAL LTD
Insolvency and resolution of construction contract disputes by adjudication in the UK construction industry - 2005 - Construction Management and Economics 23(4) May 2005, 399-408(10) .
Presents a critical review of all the cases where the courts have dealt with the effects of insolvency on the right to adjudicate and the enforceability of adjudicators' decisions. Argues that the courts may decline to enforce an adjudicator's payment decision when it is concluded that the payee would be unable to make repayment; the only exception to this would occur when the other party is in administration.
LATHAM REFORMS
HOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
BOUYGUES UK LTD V DAHL-JENSEN UK LTD
CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES
INSOLVENCY ACT 1986
A STRAUME (UK) LTD V BRADLOR DEVELOPMENTS LTD
PARKE V FENTON GREEN PARTNERSHIP
GUARDI SHOES LTD V DATUM CONTRACTS
SEAWIND TANKERS CORPORATION V BAYOIL SA
RE A DEBTOR (NO 87 OF 1999)
MONTGOMERY V WANDA MODES LTD
HERSCHEL ENGINEERING LTD V BREEN PROPERTY LTD
ABSOLUTE RENTALS LTD V GENCOR ENTERPRISES LTD
NIKKO HOTELS (UK) LTD V MEPC PLC
RAINFORD HOUSE LTD V CADOGAN LTD
ISOVEL CONTRACTS LTD V ABB BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES LTD
SL TIMBER SYSTEMS LTD V CARILLION CONSTRUCTION LTD
HIGHLAND COUNCIL FOR SUSPENSION OF A CHARGE FOR PAYMENT OF MONEY AND SUSPENSION AD INTERIM
THIRD PARTIES (RIGHTS AGAINST INSURERS) ACT 1930
GALLIFORD UK LTD V MARKEL CAPITAL LTD