Rodney Paul Lane v Peter Robin Woolway [electronic resource]
Rodney Paul Lane v Peter Robin Woolway [electronic resource]
- 2006
[2006] EWLands RA 57 2005, 9 August 2006. An appeal by a ratepayer against the decision of the Central London Valuation Tribunal, confirming the assessment in the rating list of a club and premises. The appeal arises as a result of a programme of substantial building works opposite the entrance to the hereditament. The alteration from the building works resulted in the deletion of the existing entrance during the period while scaffolding was in place. This gave grounds for making the proposal that circumstances affecting the value of the property had changed, and therefore that the rating list was inaccurate. The respondent argued that the value of the property should be reduced by 100% whilst its access was impeded. "Held": a rating reduction of 75% of the original rating was allowed during the period the scaffolding was up, followed by a reduction of 50% on the original rating after the scaffolding was taken down.
RODNEY PAUL LANE V PETER ROBIN WOOLWAY
CENTRAL LONDON VALUATION TRIBUNAL
LANDS TRIBUNAL ACT 1949
O'BRIEN V CLARK
JOHN LAING V KINGSWOOD ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
CONSETT IRON V NORTH WESTERN AREA DURHAM ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
CORUS UK V VALUATION OFFICE AGENCY
LONDON
[2006] EWLands RA 57 2005, 9 August 2006. An appeal by a ratepayer against the decision of the Central London Valuation Tribunal, confirming the assessment in the rating list of a club and premises. The appeal arises as a result of a programme of substantial building works opposite the entrance to the hereditament. The alteration from the building works resulted in the deletion of the existing entrance during the period while scaffolding was in place. This gave grounds for making the proposal that circumstances affecting the value of the property had changed, and therefore that the rating list was inaccurate. The respondent argued that the value of the property should be reduced by 100% whilst its access was impeded. "Held": a rating reduction of 75% of the original rating was allowed during the period the scaffolding was up, followed by a reduction of 50% on the original rating after the scaffolding was taken down.
RODNEY PAUL LANE V PETER ROBIN WOOLWAY
CENTRAL LONDON VALUATION TRIBUNAL
LANDS TRIBUNAL ACT 1949
O'BRIEN V CLARK
JOHN LAING V KINGSWOOD ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
CONSETT IRON V NORTH WESTERN AREA DURHAM ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE
CORUS UK V VALUATION OFFICE AGENCY
LONDON