Aluwihare (VO) v MFI Properties Ltd
Aluwihare (VO) v MFI Properties Ltd
- 1988
- Estates Gazette (8801) 9 January 1988, 67-72(4) .
LVC/121/1986. 18 August 1987. Appeal by VO against a decision in the LVC, which determined that a proposal to insert entries in a valuation list was invalid. The issue concerned a two-storey showroom , separate warehouse building and car parking space between the two. MFI occupied the first floor showroom, warehouse and parking yard - but not the ground floor. The VO proposed that the hereditaments should be entered on the valuation list as three separate rateable hereditaments, in place of the existing single hereditament. During the LVC hearing, it became apparent there were provisions in MFI`s lease to rights of car parking, and provisions as to maintenance of the yard. By the date of the present hearing, the VO had accepted MFI`s occupation was only of one hereditament, but disputed the gv figure of 24,375, contending that it should be 34,000. The LVC held the proposals were invalid: the VO appealed. MFI also contended that the notice of appeal to the tribunal by the VO was inval
INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS
LVC/121/1986. 18 August 1987. Appeal by VO against a decision in the LVC, which determined that a proposal to insert entries in a valuation list was invalid. The issue concerned a two-storey showroom , separate warehouse building and car parking space between the two. MFI occupied the first floor showroom, warehouse and parking yard - but not the ground floor. The VO proposed that the hereditaments should be entered on the valuation list as three separate rateable hereditaments, in place of the existing single hereditament. During the LVC hearing, it became apparent there were provisions in MFI`s lease to rights of car parking, and provisions as to maintenance of the yard. By the date of the present hearing, the VO had accepted MFI`s occupation was only of one hereditament, but disputed the gv figure of 24,375, contending that it should be 34,000. The LVC held the proposals were invalid: the VO appealed. MFI also contended that the notice of appeal to the tribunal by the VO was inval
INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS