Janet Reger International Ltd v Tiree Ltd [electronic resource]
Janet Reger International Ltd v Tiree Ltd [electronic resource]
- 2006
[2006] EWHC 1743 (Ch), 17 July 2006. Considers whether a landlord was liable to repair an inherent defect in its premises. J was forced to leave premises leased from T after a problem with damp, and claimed that T was liable for its losses. T argued it was not liable because the problem was caused by a design fault not covered in the lease, namely a damp-proof membrane in the floor that had not been linked to the damp-proof course in the walls. "Held": there was no implied term in the lease that the landlord would prevent damage to the part of the premises the tenant was liable to repair.
JANET REGER INTERNATIONAL LTD V TIREE
England and Wales--1543-
[2006] EWHC 1743 (Ch), 17 July 2006. Considers whether a landlord was liable to repair an inherent defect in its premises. J was forced to leave premises leased from T after a problem with damp, and claimed that T was liable for its losses. T argued it was not liable because the problem was caused by a design fault not covered in the lease, namely a damp-proof membrane in the floor that had not been linked to the damp-proof course in the walls. "Held": there was no implied term in the lease that the landlord would prevent damage to the part of the premises the tenant was liable to repair.
JANET REGER INTERNATIONAL LTD V TIREE
England and Wales--1543-