To rate or not to rate?
Russell, Paul
To rate or not to rate? - 2007 - Insight March 2007, 22-23(2) .
Discusses whether unoccupied, newly constructed and redeveloped herediments should be entered into the rating list. Discusses the basis for ratings and provides summaries of relevant legal cases.
RAVENSCROFT PROPERTIES LTD V LEWISHAM LBC
POST OFFICE V NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL
JGL INVESTMENTS LTD V SANDWELL DC
LONDON MERCHANT SECURITIES V ISLINGTON BOROUGH COUNCIL
DRAKE INVESTMENT LTD V LEWISHAM LBC
CAMDEN LBC V CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AND LANGFORD
GRAYLAW INVESTMENT LTD V IPSWICH BC
WATFORD BC V PARCOURT PROPERTY INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD
England and Wales--1543-
To rate or not to rate? - 2007 - Insight March 2007, 22-23(2) .
Discusses whether unoccupied, newly constructed and redeveloped herediments should be entered into the rating list. Discusses the basis for ratings and provides summaries of relevant legal cases.
RAVENSCROFT PROPERTIES LTD V LEWISHAM LBC
POST OFFICE V NOTTINGHAM CITY COUNCIL
JGL INVESTMENTS LTD V SANDWELL DC
LONDON MERCHANT SECURITIES V ISLINGTON BOROUGH COUNCIL
DRAKE INVESTMENT LTD V LEWISHAM LBC
CAMDEN LBC V CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY AND LANGFORD
GRAYLAW INVESTMENT LTD V IPSWICH BC
WATFORD BC V PARCOURT PROPERTY INVESTMENT COMPANY LTD
England and Wales--1543-