Staffordshire CC v Challinor and another [electronic resource]
Staffordshire CC v Challinor and another [electronic resource]
- 2007
[2007] EWCA Civ 864, 21 June 2007. The appellant local authority (S) appealed against failure of its attempts to stop a breach of planning control, and to recover costs from the respondent (C). C owned land of around two hectares. Within this, an area of half a hectare had permitted use as an area for storage of materials from a plant contractor for recycling. S had refused to allow permission for a part of the rest of the land to be used for the importation, sorting and handling of the waste. S obtained a notice to this effect, but failed at first to obtain an injunction enforcing it. Upon the granting a temporary injunction, S argued that the certificate could remove lawful use rights. "Held": The enforcement notice superseded C's lawful use certificate, which applied only to a given point in time. The inspector upholding the enforcement notice could have varied it to give precedence to the lawful use certificate, but saw no cause to do so. C's non-compliance had been absolute prior to the temporary injunction, and remained partial afterwards. S was therefore entitled to a permanent injunction. Appeal allowed.
STAFFORDSHIRE CC V CHALLINOR
England and Wales--1543-
[2007] EWCA Civ 864, 21 June 2007. The appellant local authority (S) appealed against failure of its attempts to stop a breach of planning control, and to recover costs from the respondent (C). C owned land of around two hectares. Within this, an area of half a hectare had permitted use as an area for storage of materials from a plant contractor for recycling. S had refused to allow permission for a part of the rest of the land to be used for the importation, sorting and handling of the waste. S obtained a notice to this effect, but failed at first to obtain an injunction enforcing it. Upon the granting a temporary injunction, S argued that the certificate could remove lawful use rights. "Held": The enforcement notice superseded C's lawful use certificate, which applied only to a given point in time. The inspector upholding the enforcement notice could have varied it to give precedence to the lawful use certificate, but saw no cause to do so. C's non-compliance had been absolute prior to the temporary injunction, and remained partial afterwards. S was therefore entitled to a permanent injunction. Appeal allowed.
STAFFORDSHIRE CC V CHALLINOR
England and Wales--1543-