The path to equity
Barrison, Ben
The path to equity - 2008 - Estates Gazette (0821) 31 May 2008, 130-132(3) .
Discusses the application of the legal principle of estoppel to commercial property deals. Notes that this is being used increasingly as a means of redress when commercial deals are reneged upon. Notes that promissory estoppel cannot be claimed in order to create a new cause of action. Similarly, estoppel by convention has yet to be shown to be relevant in such cases. Shows that proprietary estoppel can be used in certain circumstances. Case law.
EYESTORM LTD V HOPTONACRE HOMES LTD
LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
MCCAUSLAND V DUNCAN LAWRIE LTD
COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TOWNS V TERRACE HILL (STOCKTON) LTD
ANDERSON ANTIQUES (UK) LTD V ANDERSON WHARF (HULL) LTD AND AKRILL
LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 S77
COBBE V YEOMAN'S ROW MANAGEMENT LTD
HOPPER V HOPPER
England and Wales--1543-
The path to equity - 2008 - Estates Gazette (0821) 31 May 2008, 130-132(3) .
Discusses the application of the legal principle of estoppel to commercial property deals. Notes that this is being used increasingly as a means of redress when commercial deals are reneged upon. Notes that promissory estoppel cannot be claimed in order to create a new cause of action. Similarly, estoppel by convention has yet to be shown to be relevant in such cases. Shows that proprietary estoppel can be used in certain circumstances. Case law.
EYESTORM LTD V HOPTONACRE HOMES LTD
LAW OF PROPERTY (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ACT 1989
MCCAUSLAND V DUNCAN LAWRIE LTD
COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TOWNS V TERRACE HILL (STOCKTON) LTD
ANDERSON ANTIQUES (UK) LTD V ANDERSON WHARF (HULL) LTD AND AKRILL
LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 S77
COBBE V YEOMAN'S ROW MANAGEMENT LTD
HOPPER V HOPPER
England and Wales--1543-