The effective use of experts and expert witnesses [electronic resource]
Buckingham, Paul
The effective use of experts and expert witnesses [electronic resource] - [S.l.] Mondaq 2009
Seeks to identify the main differences between the role played by construction professionals in dispute resolution. Describes the role of an expert in the process of expert determination, and then considers the role of expert witnesses in providing opinion evidence to help the tribunal reach its decision (whether by litigation or arbitration). Concludes that experts play an important part in the dispute resolution process and that when selecting and appointing an expert, parties should make sure they find someone with the relevant expertise and knowledge.
ACADEMY OF EXPERTS CODE OF PRACTICE (2005)
EPI ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES V SYMPHONY PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES
GARETH PEARCE V OVE ARUP PARTNERSHIP LTD, MR KOOLHAAS, CITY OF ROTTERD
GREAT EASTERN HOTEL COMPANY LTD V JOHN LAING CONSTRUCTION LTD
LONDON UNDERGROUND LTD V KENCHINGTON FORD PLC (HARRIS & SUTHERLAND LTD, THIRD PARTY)
NATIONAL JUSTICE COMPANIA V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD
OWEN PELL LTD V BINDI (LONDON) LTD
SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION UK LTD V EGGER (BARONY) LTD
SPE INTERNATIONAL V PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION CONTRACTORS (UK) LTD
SUDBROOK TRADING LTD V EGGLETON
THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL PROTOCOL FOR THE INSTRUCTION OF EXPERTS TO GIVE EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CLAIMS (2005)
THE INSTITUTION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS RULES FOR EXPERT DETERMINATION (2001)
URSA MAJOR MANAGEMENT LTD. V. UNITED UTILITIES ELECTRICITY PLC
United Kingdom--
The effective use of experts and expert witnesses [electronic resource] - [S.l.] Mondaq 2009
Seeks to identify the main differences between the role played by construction professionals in dispute resolution. Describes the role of an expert in the process of expert determination, and then considers the role of expert witnesses in providing opinion evidence to help the tribunal reach its decision (whether by litigation or arbitration). Concludes that experts play an important part in the dispute resolution process and that when selecting and appointing an expert, parties should make sure they find someone with the relevant expertise and knowledge.
ACADEMY OF EXPERTS CODE OF PRACTICE (2005)
EPI ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES V SYMPHONY PLASTIC TECHNOLOGIES
GARETH PEARCE V OVE ARUP PARTNERSHIP LTD, MR KOOLHAAS, CITY OF ROTTERD
GREAT EASTERN HOTEL COMPANY LTD V JOHN LAING CONSTRUCTION LTD
LONDON UNDERGROUND LTD V KENCHINGTON FORD PLC (HARRIS & SUTHERLAND LTD, THIRD PARTY)
NATIONAL JUSTICE COMPANIA V PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE CO LTD
OWEN PELL LTD V BINDI (LONDON) LTD
SKANSKA CONSTRUCTION UK LTD V EGGER (BARONY) LTD
SPE INTERNATIONAL V PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION CONTRACTORS (UK) LTD
SUDBROOK TRADING LTD V EGGLETON
THE CIVIL JUSTICE COUNCIL PROTOCOL FOR THE INSTRUCTION OF EXPERTS TO GIVE EVIDENCE IN CIVIL CLAIMS (2005)
THE INSTITUTION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS RULES FOR EXPERT DETERMINATION (2001)
URSA MAJOR MANAGEMENT LTD. V. UNITED UTILITIES ELECTRICITY PLC
United Kingdom--