The green belt aspects of development control
Aves, Michael
The green belt aspects of development control - 2009 - Journal of Planning and Environment Law (2), 146-160(15) .
Article discusses planning control in green belt areas and looks at planning policy guidance, the recent legislative history and planning decisions in very special circumstances. Explores and provides examples of the five sequential questions to be asked when determining whether or not a planning application should be granted. The author explores some reasons that may or may not constitute special circumstances and provides further examples of cases where they have been employed. Closes by saying that any possible list of 'special circumstances' is by nature endless and that judges have a duty to judge cases qualitatively and to apply value judgements.
DONCASTER MBC V SOS ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS
KENMAL MANOR MEMORIAL GARDENS LTD V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE & ANOR
PLANNING POLICY STATEMENT 7 (SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL AREAS)
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BASILDON DC) V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE & TEMPLE
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF CHELMSFORD BC) V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF HEATH AND HAMPSTEAD SOCIETY) V VLACHOS & ANOR
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF SAMUEL SMITH OLD BREWERY (TADCASTER)) V SELBY DC)
TESCO STORES LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ANOR
WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL V SOS COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT & ORS
BASILDON DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
BRENTWOOD BC V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND GRAY
CHAPMAN V UNITED KINGDOM
England and Wales--1543-
The green belt aspects of development control - 2009 - Journal of Planning and Environment Law (2), 146-160(15) .
Article discusses planning control in green belt areas and looks at planning policy guidance, the recent legislative history and planning decisions in very special circumstances. Explores and provides examples of the five sequential questions to be asked when determining whether or not a planning application should be granted. The author explores some reasons that may or may not constitute special circumstances and provides further examples of cases where they have been employed. Closes by saying that any possible list of 'special circumstances' is by nature endless and that judges have a duty to judge cases qualitatively and to apply value judgements.
DONCASTER MBC V SOS ENVIRONMENT TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS
KENMAL MANOR MEMORIAL GARDENS LTD V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE & ANOR
PLANNING POLICY STATEMENT 7 (SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL AREAS)
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF BASILDON DC) V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE & TEMPLE
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF CHELMSFORD BC) V FIRST SECRETARY OF STATE
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF HEATH AND HAMPSTEAD SOCIETY) V VLACHOS & ANOR
R (ON THE APPLICATION OF SAMUEL SMITH OLD BREWERY (TADCASTER)) V SELBY DC)
TESCO STORES LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT & ANOR
WYCHAVON DISTRICT COUNCIL V SOS COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT & ORS
BASILDON DC V SOS ENVIRONMENT
BRENTWOOD BC V SOS ENVIRONMENT AND GRAY
CHAPMAN V UNITED KINGDOM
England and Wales--1543-