Clarence House Limited v National Westminster Bank [electronic resource]
Clarence House Limited v National Westminster Bank [electronic resource]
- 2009
[2009] EWCA Civ 1311, 8 December 2009. Case concerns whether a tenant entering into a "Virtual Assignment" of a leasehold premises acts in breach of the standard-form alienation covenants contained in the lease. The previous judge ruled that it did but only because the tenant either parted with possession, was sharing or was permitting the sharing of possession of the premises. "Held": The previous judge was correct, and erred only in his conclusions that NatWest had either parted with possession or at least shared or permitted the sharing of the property. Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal against CA decision.
CLARENCE HOUSE LTD V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC
England and Wales--1543-
[2009] EWCA Civ 1311, 8 December 2009. Case concerns whether a tenant entering into a "Virtual Assignment" of a leasehold premises acts in breach of the standard-form alienation covenants contained in the lease. The previous judge ruled that it did but only because the tenant either parted with possession, was sharing or was permitting the sharing of possession of the premises. "Held": The previous judge was correct, and erred only in his conclusions that NatWest had either parted with possession or at least shared or permitted the sharing of the property. Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal against CA decision.
CLARENCE HOUSE LTD V NATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC
England and Wales--1543-