Rajesh Patel and others v MRD Property Developments Ltd [electronic resource]
Rajesh Patel and others v MRD Property Developments Ltd [electronic resource]
- 2012
[2012] EWCA Civ 727, 31 May 2012. Concerns what a landlord needs to provide to a tenant to recover the costs of insurance premiums in a situation where a lease requires provision of a "written demand". Appellant P argued that his lease was wrongly forfeited, claiming that the relevant arrears included insurance rent that had not been demanded. "Held": Appeal dismissed. The court found that the provision of the insurance demand constituted a written demand from the defendant landlord M to the tenants.
LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
PATEL AND ORS V MRD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LTD
MANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
England and Wales--1543-
[2012] EWCA Civ 727, 31 May 2012. Concerns what a landlord needs to provide to a tenant to recover the costs of insurance premiums in a situation where a lease requires provision of a "written demand". Appellant P argued that his lease was wrongly forfeited, claiming that the relevant arrears included insurance rent that had not been demanded. "Held": Appeal dismissed. The court found that the provision of the insurance demand constituted a written demand from the defendant landlord M to the tenants.
LAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S146
PATEL AND ORS V MRD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LTD
MANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
England and Wales--1543-