Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd
Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd
- 2012
[2012] UKSC 41, 10 October 2012. Two co-joined appeals concerned with the definition of a house for enfranchisement purposes under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(1). Properties used entirely for commercial purposes are not houses within the meaning of s2(1) whatever their original design or current appearance. Held: Appeal allowed. CA decisions overturned.
DAY AND ANOTHER V HOSEBAY LTD
HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V LEXGORGE LTD
LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1)
England and Wales--1543-
[2012] UKSC 41, 10 October 2012. Two co-joined appeals concerned with the definition of a house for enfranchisement purposes under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(1). Properties used entirely for commercial purposes are not houses within the meaning of s2(1) whatever their original design or current appearance. Held: Appeal allowed. CA decisions overturned.
DAY AND ANOTHER V HOSEBAY LTD
HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD V LEXGORGE LTD
LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1)
England and Wales--1543-