Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Ltd and ors v The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London [electronic resource]
Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Ltd and ors v The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London [electronic resource]
- 2012
[2012] EWHC 2527 (Ch), 12 September 2012. Courts will have strong regard to the original commercial arrangement between parties when fixing the terms for a new business tenancy. Determined whether tenants can renew their leases at a fixed rent without a variable service charge. Claimants E sought new tenancies as they wished to pay fully inclusive rents rather than variable service charges. Defendants C argued that it was fair that the claimant tenants should cover repair and maintenance costs. "Held": the court found in favour of the defendants: a variable charge was fair and reasonable.
EDWARDS & WALKDEN (NORFOLK) LTD AND ORS V MAYOR AND COMMONALTY AND CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF LONDON
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
HYAMS V TITAN PROPERTIES LTD
England and Wales--1543-
[2012] EWHC 2527 (Ch), 12 September 2012. Courts will have strong regard to the original commercial arrangement between parties when fixing the terms for a new business tenancy. Determined whether tenants can renew their leases at a fixed rent without a variable service charge. Claimants E sought new tenancies as they wished to pay fully inclusive rents rather than variable service charges. Defendants C argued that it was fair that the claimant tenants should cover repair and maintenance costs. "Held": the court found in favour of the defendants: a variable charge was fair and reasonable.
EDWARDS & WALKDEN (NORFOLK) LTD AND ORS V MAYOR AND COMMONALTY AND CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF LONDON
LANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954
HYAMS V TITAN PROPERTIES LTD
England and Wales--1543-