Buckle v Holderness BC
Buckle v Holderness BC
- 1996
- Rating & Valuation Reporter [1996] 36 RVR 86-91(6) .
LT 9 January 1995. The applicant had been refused permission to fell a tree which was apparently affecting the foundations of his nearby property. As a result he claimed compensation in respect of remedial works, including underpinning. The sum payable was decided by the tribunal on the basis that even if the tree had been felled some remedial work would need to be undertaken.
BUCKLE V HOLDERNESS BC
COMPENSATION
CONSENT TO FELL
REFUSAL
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE
TREE PRESERVATION ORDER
TREE ROOTS
UNDERPINNING
LT 9 January 1995. The applicant had been refused permission to fell a tree which was apparently affecting the foundations of his nearby property. As a result he claimed compensation in respect of remedial works, including underpinning. The sum payable was decided by the tribunal on the basis that even if the tree had been felled some remedial work would need to be undertaken.
BUCKLE V HOLDERNESS BC
COMPENSATION
CONSENT TO FELL
REFUSAL
STRUCTURAL DAMAGE
TREE PRESERVATION ORDER
TREE ROOTS
UNDERPINNING