Outline applications and permissions: the refurbishment of time-worn practice? (Record no. 104918)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02873cam a2200181 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ##L131949
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 051219n1999 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u131949
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Crow, Stephen
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Harris, Neil
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Outline applications and permissions: the refurbishment of time-worn practice?
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. London
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. RICS
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1999
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. "The procedure whereby application may be made for outline permission is a valuable one in that it.. enables the principle of development and land use to be established without the need to investigate detailed matters at that stage". Yet this system of outline applications and permissions whereby property owners and developers of all sorts can obtain a bankable assurance of planning status is now subject to question, including a fundamental question raised by the same Court of Appeal judgement from which this quotation comes. In R v Newbury District Council and Newbury and District Agricultural Society, ex p. Chieveley Parish Council (Times Law Report 10/09/98), the Court delivered a severe challenge to outline practice by disposing of the commonly held view that size and scale are covered by the reserving "siting" and "design" in the terms of the current General Development Procedure Order. A second severe challenge is that the recent EU Environmental Impact Assessment Directive (97/11/EC) will make it difficult to submit a valid outline application because the necessity of providing environmental information is at odds with the outline concept. Both these challenges need to be taken seriously, with a view to making an informed decision as to whether the problems can be tackled by the ascertaining and promulgation of good practice only, or whether amendment of the GDPO is called for. To this end, a short piece of research is being undertaken to review current practice, finding out how planning authorities and property professionals are responding to these problems. At the same time, the research will also usefully study other aspects of practice which have been affected by court judgements, such as the sometimes confusing practice of seeking the approval of reserved matters in stages in a large development. It is time anyway for a review of this very common and useful procedural device and the identification of best practice. The research, following the study of the legal and policy background, which is virtually complete, will comprise a postal questionnaire survey of a small number of local planning authority planning departments of different kinds and professional firms, followed by selected case studies leading to a final report by mid-July 1999.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This item is no longer available.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-DEVELOPMENT CONTROL-PLANNING APPLICATIONS
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Virtual Virtual Online 19/12/2005   131949-2001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Book