Valuation standards and practices in Sweden and the Netherlands, implications for common European investment valuation standards (Record no. 104958)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02444cam a2200193 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ##L132005
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 051220n1999 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u132005
041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE
Language code of text/sound track or separate title eng
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name McParland, Clare
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Adair, Alastair
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name McGreal, Stanley
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Valuation standards and practices in Sweden and the Netherlands, implications for common European investment valuation standards
260 00 - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Place of publication, distribution, etc. London
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. RICS
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 1999
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Harmonisation of European property investment valuations is primarily driven by the continuing internationalisation of business. A key step in the process of harmonisation has been the publication of the Guide Bleu by the European Group of Valuers of Assets (TEGOVA). However, there is a strong recognition on the part of valuers and academics that the process of harmonisation is not necessarily a smooth one due to incompatibility in valuers' qualifications and specific valuation practices. To investigate this, research was undertaken with valuers in Sweden and the Netherlands as part of wider Pan-European investigations. This paper reports on valuer opinions relating to the following key areas investigated; the level of awareness of the Guide Bleu; the perceived importance and relevance of the Guide Bleu to national investment valuation practices; the primary factors promoting and hindering the development of common European investment valuation standards; national standards most commonly implemented and the justification of their use; the level of transparency of the property markets; the take-up of the Guide Bleu standards and what factors would influence valuers to use them; how national practices and standards promote/hinder the use of the Guide Bleu; valuer interpretation of the terminology used in the definition of the approved IVSC/TEGOVA definition of market value. This research was undertaken in order that variations and similarities between the national investment valuation standards and practices of Sweden and the Netherlands could be identified and compared. Conclusions are drawn upon the extent of the differences and common features between the two countries, and to what extent the national definitions of market value compare and contrast to the approved ISVC/TEGOVA definition of market value.
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. This item is no longer available.
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element PROPERTY-PROPERTY VALUATION AND APPRAISAL
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Virtual Virtual Online 20/12/2005   ONLINE PUBLICATION 132005-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Book