King and others v Udlaw Ltd (Record no. 108296)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01928cad a22002175a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L143865 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 080604e20080320xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u143865 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 050 04 - LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CALL NUMBER | |
| Classification number | 346.4104342 $2 18 |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | King and others v Udlaw Ltd |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | London |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | Lands Tribunal |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | LRX/186/2006, 20 March 2008. Considered whether a bungalow used for providing holiday accommodation was a dwelling for the purposes of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s18. The appellant (K) was the leasehold owner and occupier of a holiday bungalow on a park owned by the respondent freeholder (U). K was covenanted to pay service charges to U. U applied to the tribunal for determination of the level of charges. The tribunal ruled that it was unable to determine this as holiday accommodation was not governed by the Act. K appealed, arguing established common ground between K and U that the bungalow provided all the facilities and amenities required for long-term occupation, and K was in fact resident for significant periods of the year. "Held": The issue to be determined was whether the bungalow constituted a dwelling. Planning law based the distinction on the facilities required for daily living, while housing and rent legislation required that it be occupied as a home. Planning legislation concerned a separate area of law. K was under covenant that the bungalow was not his home, therefore it could not be considered a dwelling within the meaning of the Act. Appeal dismissed. |
| 521 2# - TARGET AUDIENCE NOTE | |
| Target audience note | Advanced |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | KING AND OTHERS V LUDLAW LTD |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-RESIDENTIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT-RESIDENTIAL SERVICE CHARGES |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=503">https://www.landstribunal.gov.uk/Aspx/view.aspx?id=503</a> |
| Public note | View the judgment free of charge at www.landstribunal.gov.uk... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 04/06/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 143865-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |