Grosvenor Estates Ltd v Prospect Estates Ltd (Record no. 109000)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01937cad a22002655a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | L145980 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 081127e20081121xxk f v 000 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u145980 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Grosvenor Estates Ltd v Prospect Estates Ltd |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2008 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2008] EWCA Civ 1281, 21 November 2008. Appellant Landlord (G) appealled against a decision that the respondent (P) had the right to buy the freehold to a building that was a house "reasonably so called" under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 S2(1), despite the fact that the lease stipulated that 88.5% of the property had to be used as an office. The building had to be maintained as appearing as a dwelling house and allowing it to appear as an office was prohibited. The judge in the original case had held that Lord Roskill's third proposition in Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeon's Homes applied and that this was a key reason for granting the right to purchase the freehold. Held: appeal allowed. The original judge was ruled to have misapplied Tandon and did not take full account of the circumstances of the prevailing use of the building. While the building had to keep the appearance of a dwelling as it was within a conservation area, it could no longer reasonably be called a house. |
| 521 ## - TARGET AUDIENCE NOTE | |
| Target audience note | Advanced |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | KA NTK |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TANDON V TRUSTEES OF SPURGEONS HOMES |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASEHOLD REFORM ACT 1967 S2(1) |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LAKE V BENNETT |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MALEKSHAD V HOWARD DE WALDEN ESTATES LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BOSS HOLDINGS LTD V GROSVENOR WEST END PROPERTIES LTD AND ANOTHER |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | GROSVENOR ESTATES LTD V PROSPECT ESTATES LTD |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | England and Wales |
| Chronological subdivision | 1543- |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL PROPERTY-COMMERCIAL LANDLORD AND TENANT |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1281.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1281.html</a> |
| Public note | View the item free of charge online at www.bailii.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 27/11/2008 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 145980-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |