Millshaw Property Co Ltd v Preston BC (Record no. 11486)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01386cab a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS55560 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1996 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u17319 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Millshaw Property Co Ltd v Preston BC |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1996 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Rent Review & Lease Renewal |
| Volume/sequential designation | 16(1) Summer 1996 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ChD 23 November 1995. P demised a plot of undeveloped land to M`s p predecessors. The lease required the tenant to carry out development on the demised land. Rent review referred to an arbitrator following a failure to agree on the revised rent. Review rent was to be determined on the basis of a hypothetical letting of the premises on specified terms and `for a term of years not exceeding the residue of the term at the date of the certificate`. M sought a declaration that the hypothetical lease should be the residue of the term remaining at the review date. P argued for a shorter period. "Held" the words `not exceeding` in the review clause meant `up to` and were words of limitation. Decision for landlord. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HYPOTHETICAL LEASE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEASES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MILLSHAW PROPERTY CO LTD V PRESTON BC |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RENT REVIEW CLAUSE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RENT REVIEWS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS55560 | 17319-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |