Don't get locked out (Record no. 118205)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01781cam a2200277 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS68378 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 041021n2004 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u127784 |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | Murdoch, J. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Don't get locked out |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2004 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (0441) 9 October 2004, 151(1) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Considers the value of exclusivity or lock-out agreements as an anti-gazumping protection, under which a vendor in return for some inducement from a prospective purchaser promises to negotiate in good faith with that purchaser alone. Examines the relevant case law. In "Walford v Miles" (HL, [1992] 2 AC 198), held that lock-out agreements were not too vague to be legally enforceable. In "Pitt v PHH Asset Management Ltd",(CA, [1993] 4 All ER 961), the claimant successfully sued the defendant company for damages for breach of the lock-out agreement and in "Tye v House" (ChD, Abs57790), it was held that a disappointed purchaser could not gain an injunction to prevent the vendor from selling to someone in breach of a lock-out agreement. In conclusion looks at "Dandara Holdings Ltd v Co-operative Retail Services Ltd " ([2004] EWHC 1476 (Ch), [2004] ALL ER (D) 246 (Jun)) where the court accepted the idea that damages for breach of a lock-out agreement can reflect loss of the chance of purchasing a property. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | ABS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | GAZUMPING |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ANTI-GAZUMPING AGREEMENTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PITT V PHH ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TYE V HOUSE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DANDARA HOLDINGS LTD V CO-OPERATIVE RETAIL SERVICES LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WALFORD V MILES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EXCLUSIVITY AGREEMENTS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LOCK-OUT AGREEMENTS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY AND LAND LAW-AGENCY-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 21/10/2004 | ABS68378 | 127784-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Journal article |