William Verry Ltd v North West London Communal Mikvah (Record no. 118212)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02187cam a2200217 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field ABS68334
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 041021n2004 000 0 eng u
035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER
System control number (Sirsi) u127795
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title William Verry Ltd v North West London Communal Mikvah
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2004
490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT
Series statement Building Law Reports
Volume/sequential designation [2004] BLR 308-322(15)
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. [2004] EWHC 1300 (TCC), 11 June 2004. Application by claimant (W) for summary judgment to enforce adjudicator's decision for a sum of money to be paid by defendant (N) for the construction of a Mikvah ( a Jewish ritual bath). JCT 1998 Private with Quantities was used. The first two adjudications had been successfully enforced. Application arises out of third application dated and issued on 23 January 2004 directing N to pay a sum of money plus interest. N declined to pay on three jurisdictional grounds: the adjudicator's decision was invalid because the referral notice was issued one day too late; there was no relevant dispute in existence when W served its purported notice of adjudication; and the adjudicator failed to consider a critical issue which had been referred to him. The commentary section outlines five key points for consideration. Firstly, Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s108(2)(b) re compliance with notice of referral. Secondly, consideration of the dispute referred to adjudication. Thirdly, had the adjudicator erred. Fourthly, having considered that the adjudicator had erred, consideration had to be given as to whether the errors were jurisdictional or intra-jurisdiction. Finally N had not been given a fair hearing as the adjudicator had not considered their contentions on a core issue. Summary judgment in favour of W granted. Directed that judgment should not be drawn up for six weeks to give defendant N opportunity to make application for new adjudication.
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN)
Local note ABS
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element WILLIAM VERRY LTD V NORTH WEST LONDON COMMUNAL MIKVAH
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108(2)(B)
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ADJUDICATION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element JCT 1998 PRIVATE WITH QUANTITIES
690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN)
Topical term or geographic name as entry element DISPUTE RESOLUTION-CASE LAW
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Suppress in OPAC 0
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total Checkouts Full call number Barcode Date last seen Copy number Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     London London Journal article 21/10/2004   ABS68334 127795-1001 06/08/2019 1 06/08/2019 Law report