John Roberts Architects Ltd v Parkcare Homes (No2) Ltd (Record no. 120469)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02439cam a2200181 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ##L131309 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 051019n 000 0 eng u |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u131309 |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | John Roberts Architects Ltd v Parkcare Homes (No2) Ltd |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2005] EWHC 1637, 25 July 2005. Considered whether an adjudicator ceased to have jurisdiction to award costs when adjudication proceedings were discontinued. J sought to recover its costs in discontinued adjudication proceedings initiated by P. The contract provided that adjudication procedures should adhere to the Scheme for Construction Contracts, and that the adjudicator had discretion to award payment of one party's legal costs and expenses by the other as part of his decision. P abandoned its claim after substantial costs had been incurred. The adjudicator directed that P should pay J's adjudication costs as well as his own fees and disbursements. J argued firstly that the adjudicator was entitled to award costs, secondly that for reasons of business efficacy and to reflect the intention of the parties, it was necessary to imply a term giving the adjudicator the power to make an order for costs, and thirdly that P was estopped from denying that the adjudicator lacked jurisdiction. "Held" It was understandable that an adjudication agreement should contain provision for recovery of costs in certain circumstances as the Scheme for Construction Contracts does not, and it was plain that the adjudicator was entitled to direct payment of costs only as part of his decision; a term would not be implied to give business efficacy unless necessary to prevent failure of consideration, and the terms implied by J fell short of this requirement; P had only elected to treat the adjudicator as having jurisdiction in accordance with the contract, and was not electing or promising not to exercise its power to discontinue the adjudication proceedings. |
| 590 ## - LOCAL NOTE (RLIN) | |
| Local note | IKA251005 |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JOHN ROBERTS ARCHITECTS LTD V PARKCARE HOMES LTD |
| 650 24 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INVESTORS COMPENSATION SCHEME LTD V WEST BROMWICH BUILDING SOCIETY |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS-ADJUDICATORS' JURISDICTION |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailli.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/1637.html">https://www.bailli.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2005/1637.html</a> |
| Public note | View the website free of charge at www.bailli.org... |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 19/10/2005 | ONLINE PUBLICATION | 131309-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |