Brompton Estates Nominees No.1 Limited & Brompton Estates Nominees No.2 Limited v Wall Properties Limited (Record no. 121863)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02062nas a22002057a 4500 |
| 007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | c| a| aa|aa |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 230831e20240313xxk||||os||||o00| 0 eng d |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Brompton Estates Nominees No.1 Limited & Brompton Estates Nominees No.2 Limited v Wall Properties Limited |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION INFORMATION | |
| Place of publication | LON/00AW/BSG/2024/0001 |
| Publisher | First Tier Tribunal Property Chamber (Residential Property) |
| Date | 13 March 2024 |
| 520 ## - ABSTRACT | |
| Abstract | Ovington Court is an occupied higher-risk building within the meaning of section 71 of the 2022 Act. The difficulty in the present case is that both the Applicants and the Respondent appear to fall within the definition of accountable person, albeit for different parts of the Building.<br/><br/>The Applicants and Respondent are each accountable persons within the meaning of section 73(1)(b) of the 2022 Act as each holds a legal estate in possession of relevant parts of the structure and exterior of the Building. Accordingly, the provisions of section 75(2) are engaged: the tribunal must consider which accountable person is appropriate to be the principal accountable person for the Building. There is no further guidance within the 2022 Act as to how the tribunal determines which accountable person it considers is appropriate to be the principal accountable person. However, on the facts of the present case, the parties agree that the Respondent would be the most appropriate on the grounds that it is under a repairing obligation in relation to: (1) the structure and exterior surfaces of the majority of the Building, including those floors solely occupied for residential purposes and (2) the common parts generally within those floors<br/> |
| 650 ## - KEYWORDS | |
| Keywords | BUILDING SAFETY ACT 2022 |
| 650 ## - KEYWORDS | |
| Keywords | HIGHER-RISK BUILDING |
| 650 ## - KEYWORDS | |
| Keywords | FIRE SAFETY |
| 650 ## - KEYWORDS | |
| Keywords | LEASEHOLD PROPERTY |
| 650 ## - KEYWORDS | |
| Keywords | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTABLE PERSON |
| 650 ## - KEYWORDS | |
| Keywords | RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY |
| 651 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | United Kingdom |
| 856 ## - ONLINE RESOURCE | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65f2e6089d99de001103deb8/Ovington_Court_decision.pdf |
| Public note | Available online via the Tribunal |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Koha normalized classification for sorting | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONLINE_JUDGMENT | Virtual | Virtual | Online | 21/03/2024 | ONLINE JUDGMENT | 21/03/2024 | 21/03/2024 | Law report |