Bratt v Jones (Record no. 122154)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01754nab a22002415a 4500 |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250512110031.0 |
| 007 - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION FIXED FIELD--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | cu || ||||||aa |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 250512t2025 xxk oo | o000 0 eng | |
| 041 0# - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Bratt v Jones |
| Medium | [electronic resource] |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Place of publication, distribution, etc. | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc. | [2025] EWCA Civ 562 |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2 May 2025 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | [2025] EWCA Civ 562, upholds earlier decision in [2024] EWHC 625 (KB) where the claimant claimed damages from the defendant valuer in relation to his valuation of a freehold development site. The claimant argued that the court should reach a determination as to the true market value of the site as at June 2013, and find<br/>that the likely value was £8 million and that the defendant was negligent because his valuation was well outside a 10% margin. The claimant failed to show that the defendant valuer had been negligent where his valuation fell within the bracket of a reasonable range of values, which was plus or minus 15% of the most likely value determined by the court. <br/>The appropriate primary approach to valuation of the site was by reference to comparables, but that should<br/>be cross-checked by a residual valuation, since developer purchasers would have carried out their own detailed residual<br/>calculations in respect of the site, by reference to the anticipated sale proceeds less the costs of construction<br/> |
| 650 0# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RESIDUAL VALUATION |
| 650 0# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BRATT V JONES |
| 650 0# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MERRIVALE MOORE PLC V STRUTT & PARKER |
| 650 0# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COMPARABLES |
| 650 0# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE |
| 650 0# - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | VALUATION |
| 651 #4 - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--GEOGRAPHIC NAME | |
| Geographic name | United Kingdom |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | Valuation |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6273 |
| 856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2025/562.html">https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2025/562.html</a> |
| Public note | Available on BAILII |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual | Virtual | Online | 12/05/2025 | ONLINE JUDGMENT | 12/05/2025 | 12/05/2025 | Law report |