R v Nottingham City Council ex parte Nottinghamshire CC; R v Mansfield DC ex parte Nottinghamshire CC (Record no. 12622)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01544cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS39787 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1988 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u18970 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | R v Nottingham City Council ex parte Nottinghamshire CC; R v Mansfield DC ex parte Nottinghamshire CC |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1988 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Rating & Valuation Reporter |
| Volume/sequential designation | 1988 RVR 151-158(8) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 26 May 1988. Appeals by two rating authorities , Nottingham City Council and Mansfield District Council concerning the calculation of the product of a penny rate in the said districts. It had been the practice for rating authorities to make resolutions under the General Rate Act 1967 s55 to rate owners instead of occupiers on certain classes of property and for the rating authority to make owners` allowances in respect of its own properties. Nottingham CC wished to increase the rateable value limit to £200 for 1988/89. A similar course of events followed at Mansfield. The county council applied to quash the resolutions, contending; 1) a rating authority could not lawfully make an allowance to itself under s55; 2) that such an allowance could not properly be deducted in calculating the product of a penny rate and 3) that the rating authorities had not acted lawfully in passing resolutions under s55 for the 1988/89 year. The resolutions of the rating authorities were quashed and the |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RATE SUPPORT GRANT |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | RATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS39787 | 18970-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |