Elite Investments Ltd v TI Bainbridge Silencers Ltd (Record no. 1390)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01604cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS37099 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1986 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u2300 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Elite Investments Ltd v TI Bainbridge Silencers Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1986 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | 280 (6311) 22 November 1986, 1001-1012(7) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ChD 9 May 1986. Injunction, damages and other relief claimed by plaintiff landlords in relation to alleged breaches of repairing covenants by the defendant tenants in respect of leases of two units in an industrial building erected in 1940. The main action concerned the larger of the two units, the roof of which had reached a serious state of dilapidation and needed to be replaced. The tenants disclaimed liability . The main point at issue was whether the replacement of the roof constituted a repair within the scope of the repairing covenant or renewal outside of it. The judge found that 1) the roof was not coated originally, it was left as a galvanised sheet, 2) the bitumastic coating which was on from about 1964 onwards was put on after the galvanising had largely worn off, 3) the roof was deteriorating throughout and was deteriorating at the time of the grant of the leases and 4) by 1984 the roof was beyond patching and needed to be replaced. The tenants` solicitor argued that the |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BREACH OF COVENANT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HAMILTON V MARTELL SECURITIES LIMITED |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INHERENT DEFECT |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS37099 | 2300-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |