Sweet v SoS for the Environment and the Nature Conservancy Council (Record no. 22489)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01535cab a2200193 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS41969 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1989 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u33757 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Sweet v SoS for the Environment and the Nature Conservancy Council |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1989 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Planning and Environment Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | 1989 JPL 927-934 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | ENDS Report |
| Volume/sequential designation | No 179 Decemebr 1989, 26-27(10) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | QBD 24 January 1989. Mr Sweet (S) had a Nature Conservation order made out on land which comprised 3 meadows and associated ditches totalling 7.57 hectares but, contained within a much larger SSSI . The order was made under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 and remained unaltered after a public inquiry . S challenged the order on the basis that only the part of the land that was of scientific significance was covered by the notice, the rest was merely contiguous. This approach was rejected as the statute entitled the SoS to draw boundaries of the order where he had done and treat the site as a whole. S`s second challenge to the order concerned the range of activities prevented by the order. S argued that the Act referred to`operations` such as cultivation and use of vehicles. he considered that some of these `operations` were `activities` and did not need to be notified to the NCC. This approach was also rejected as the terms, although not precise, were sufficiently broad as to e |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | CONSERVATION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS41969 | 33757-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |