Bissett v Marwin Securities Ltd (Record no. 2255)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01586cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS37315 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u3673 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Bissett v Marwin Securities Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1987 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | 281(6316) 10 January 1987, 75-76(2) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ChD 2 October 1986. Concerned construction of a rent review clause. An originating summons was made by the lessee. The lease stipulated the premises be used only for the operation of amusement machines at a rent of £12,500 pa subject to an upwards-only rent review at regular intervals. At the first review, the lessor`s surveyors served notice, stating the new rent was to be £18,300 determined by adding an additional rent calculated at 10% per annum compound on the initial rent of £12,500. The lessee objected on the basis that the 10% compound formula operated only if there had been a "preceding rent review". The lessors replied that if the compound formula was inappropriate, they would rely on the retail price index or similar to produce a sum of £15,635. The court had to determine the rent for the first review period. The lessors argued that the 10% formula should be read as if, after the words "the immediately preceding rent review", there were added the words "or the commencement |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | C H BAILEY LTD V MEMORIAL ENTERPRISES LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CONSTRUCTION OF CLAUSE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RENT REVIEW PERIOD |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS37315 | 3673-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |