Thrasyvoulou v SoS for the Environment and others; Oliver and others v SoS for the Environment and another (Record no. 24297)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01508cab a2200181 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS42585 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u37707 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Thrasyvoulou v SoS for the Environment and others; Oliver and others v SoS for the Environment and another |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1990 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1990) 13 EG 69-78(6) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | HL 14 December 1989. These two appeals raise the question whether a decision of the SoS allowing an appeal against an enforcement notice on one of the grounds in Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s88 as amended by Local Government and Planning (Amendment) Act 1981 is capable of giving rise to an estoppel per rem judicatam or an issue estoppel. The first appeal arose from service of notice on T in February 1985 alleging breach of planning control due to a material change of use to a hostel for homeless families without the grant of planning permission. Appeals dismissed by the inspector. An appeal to the High Court was also dismissed but CA allowed T`s case. The SoS appealed to HL. The second appeal concerned an enforcement notice alleging a material change of use of a property. The various judicial stages followed the same pattern. In T`s, and by implication O`s, case HL rejected submissions by SoS that a statutory body cannot be fettered by estoppel and there was no justification f |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS42585 | 37707-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |