Meyer v Riddick and others (Record no. 24841)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01500cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS42741 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u38662 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Meyer v Riddick and others |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1990 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1990) 18 EG 97-98(2) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 24 October 1989. Appeal by tenant (M) from cc decision dismissing his application for a new tenancy and holding that landlords (H) had established the grounds of opposition set out in Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s30(1)(g) that they intended to use the premises for business purposes. H, trustees under a trust for sale, had acquired the reversionary interest in 1980. Two of the trustees intended to occupy the premises for the purpose of a business carried on by them in partnership with other persons, but the third trustee did not intend to do so. In order not to exclude the third trustee from the benefit of beneficial interest under the trust for sale, it was necessary for the three trustees to let the premises under a lease to the partnership as a whole. This meant that the first two trustees would occupy the premises by virtue of the lease and not by virtue of their position as beneficiaries under a trust. That was not occupation as "beneficiaries" under the 1954 Act and did not |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BUSINESS TENANCIES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CASE LAW |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS42741 | 38662-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |