Farmer (VO) and another v Buxted Poultry Ltd (Record no. 24926)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01520cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS42798 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u38858 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Farmer (VO) and another v Buxted Poultry Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1990 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Rating Appeals |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1990) RA 105-120(9) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | LT 24 November 1989. Appeals from decisions of lvc that a poultry processing factory and premises and a provender mill were both exempt from rating as agricultural buildings . The mill was occupied by a company and used for food production, the majority of which was fed to poultry on the company`s breeding and rearing farms, situated between a quarter of a mile and 120 miles from the mill. The factory was also occupied by the company and used to process poultry from the farms. The issue was whether the buildings were "occupied together with" and "used solely in connection with the operations" carried on at the farms within the Rating Act 1971 s2 . LT held, dismissing the appeals, that 1) the mill was solely used as an agricultural building; 2) that both the subject hereditaments were, as a matter of fact, occupied together with the company`s farms and 3) the whole of the factory was an agricultural building or buildings used in connection with agricultural operations on the rearing f |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CASE LAW |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EXEMPTION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | RATING APPEAL |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | RATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS42798 | 38858-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |