Luxmoore-May and another v Messenger May Baverstock (a firm) (Record no. 24927)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01338cab a2200205 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS42799 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u38862 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Luxmoore-May and another v Messenger May Baverstock (a firm) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1990 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | All England Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1990) 1 All ER 1067-1084(18) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 21 December 1989. Appeal by the auctioneers (M) against a decision in favour of L, which held that M were negligent in a valuation of two paintings ; valued at between £30 and £50. They were sold at auction on behalf of L for £840. Five months later they re-appeared on the market and were sold as paintings by Stubbs at £88,000. The appeal was allowed; M had not been negligent. Valuation of pictures was not an exact science and the question, had the paintings the potential to be Stubbs paintings, was something that competent valuers could have widely differing views about. As the evidence did not justify the judges conclusion that no competent valuer could have failed to spot that the paintings could possibly have been by Stubbs, negligence on the part of M could not be established. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | Arts and antiques |
| 9 (RLIN) | 6217 |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SLEEPER |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | RATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS42799 | 38862-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |