Kensington Pension Developments Ltd v Royal Garden Hotel (Oddenino`s) Ltd (Record no. 25845)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01380cab a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS43079 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u40339 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Kensington Pension Developments Ltd v Royal Garden Hotel (Oddenino`s) Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1990 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1990) 27 EG 79 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | ChD 25 January 1990. An underlease was granted by K in 1964 to R for construction of a new hotel for 150 years with regular rent reviews . Questions arose because part of the new building was outside the area of the land demised. Should the valuer for purposes of rent review schedule, value the hotel as it stood or only the demised premises which did not include the whole of the hotel. The doctrine of accretion or encroachment should be applied and the whole of the hotel should be valued. A yearly rack rental value should also be charged on the whole building as a hypothetical tenant would have acquired the whole of the building including the portion not included in the demised part of the hotel. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EASTWOOD V ASHTON |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MORTON V WOODS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLAN |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SMIRK V LYNDALE DEVELOPMENTS LTD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SUBLEASE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | WHITMORE V HAMPLINES |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-RENT REVIEWS |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS43079 | 40339-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |