DOE v Thomas Bates and Son (New Towns Commission, third party) (Record no. 26564)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01555cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS43320 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1990 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u41333 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | DOE v Thomas Bates and Son (New Towns Commission, third party) |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1990 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | All England Law Reports |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1990) 2 All ER 943-947(5) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | HL 26 July 1990 Appeal by DOE against CA decision, dismissing its appeal against that part of the order made by ORC whereby he ordered that DOE had no cause of action against Thomas Bates (T) for damages for repairs undertaken to strengthen pillars in a tower block in Basildon , Essex. In its appeal, DOE contended, relying on Anns v Merton , that T owed them a duty of care and were liable for the cost of the repairing works the DOE had carried out. HL held that the loss suffered by the DOE in carrying out the repair works was purely economic loss and as such were not recoverable, because at the time that the work was being carried out, the building was not unsafe by reason of defective construction, but merely suffered a defect in quality which made the DOE`s lease less valuable than it would otherwise have been, in that the building could not be loaded to its design capacity, unless any occupier who wished to do so incurred the expenditure necessary to strengthen the pillars. Appeal |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CASE LAW |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LIABILITY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | NEGLIGENCE |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS43320 | 41333-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |