Stradbroke (Earl of) v Mitchell (Record no. 28321)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01616cab a2200229 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS43982 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u44561 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Stradbroke (Earl of) v Mitchell |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1991 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1991) 03 EG 128-135; 04 EG 132-136(10) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 31 July 1990 Appeal by landlord (S) from ChD decision that a notice to quit given by S purporting to terminate the tenancy of two farms held by the defendant (M), was a nullity because of fraudulent misrepresentations contained in the notice. S had served a notice on M in accordance with Agricultural Holdings Act 1986 Sched 3 Case E on the grounds that M had let five cottages on the tenanted land, in breach of covenant, to people not working on the farm. M contended that S had previously given his consent to four of the lettings or they were not in fact let in breach of covenant. With regard to the fifth, the letting had already come to an end before the service of the notice and therefore did not constitute an irremediable breach. After considering four questions raised by the case, CA held, dismissing the appeal, that a notice to quit was invalid and to no effect if it contained a statement which was false and which the landlord had made fraudulently, whether or not the tenant.... |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PROPERTY-LANDLORD AND TENANT-TENANCIES-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | CASE LAW |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | FRAUD |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ROUS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | LANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS43982 | 44561-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |