Bromsgrove DC and Beoley Parish Council v SoS for the Environment and London & Edinburgh Trust plc (Record no. 32469)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01624cab a2200217 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS45331 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1991 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u52385 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Bromsgrove DC and Beoley Parish Council v SoS for the Environment and London & Edinburgh Trust plc |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1991 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Planning and Environment Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | 1991 JPL 877-889(13) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | QBD 27 March 1991. In October 1985, the SoS approved the Hereford and Worcester County Structure Plan with modifications. The accompanying letter proposed a joint study in regard to the future prospects of Redditch, by Hereford and Worcester DC and Warwickshire CC. In April 1987 they delivered an interim report stating that the extent of location and the desirability of future development could only be determined in conjunction with the statutory planning process which included a statement recognising the development of 67 acres in the Beoley and Holt End areas. Bromsgrove DC in response expressed the view that development to the north and east of Redditch was unacceptable. When the final proposal was published the area was still included. Hereford and Worcester CC required this to be added to the structure plan for high technology development. Bromsgrove DC issued objections. Beoley Parish Council suggested that an area at Wythall, a car transporter depot, would be suitable for deve |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MODIFICATIONS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | STRUCTURE PLANS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS45331 | 52385-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |