Zemhunt (Holdings) Ltd v Control Securities plc (Record no. 34286)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01602cab a2200241 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS45990 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u56217 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Zemhunt (Holdings) Ltd v Control Securities plc |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1992 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Scots Law Times |
| Volume/sequential designation | 1992 SLT 151-156(6) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | Second Division 30 October 1991. A company made a successful bid at auction for a property subject to general conditions including a requirement that the purchasers pay a 10% deposit to the auctioneer to be held by him as agents to the seller. It also provided that the balance be paid in full on a subsequent date. A delay in payment of over ten days entitled the sellers to resile. The purchaser did fail to pay and the sellers resiled. The purchaser raised an action seeking repayment of the deposit. Before the Lord Ordinary the sellers argued that on proper construction of the contract the deposit fell to be forfeited and that it would be wrong to recover the deposit when termination of the contract was due to their own material breach. The LO held that `deposit` fell to be construed as meaning advance part payment and did not necessarily imply forfeiture, but that restitution should not be allowed to those who were responsible for terminating the contract. The purchasers appealed on |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | BREACH OF CONTRACT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | DEFINITION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MATERIAL BREACH |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | SCOTLAND |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | VENDOR AND PURCHASER |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PROPERTY LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS45990 | 56217-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |