Lambeth LBC v SOS for the Environment and the London Residuary Body (Record no. 36546)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01487cab a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS46812 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u59551 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Lambeth LBC v SOS for the Environment and the London Residuary Body |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1992 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Planning and Environment Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | 1992 JPL 759-768(6) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | CA 11 March 1992. The local authority (L) challenged the SoS decision allowing planning permission for redevelopment of County Hall. L argued that (1) the SoS had not paid sufficient regard to the policy set out in DoE Circular 8/87 "Historic buildings and conservation areas: policy and procedures (2) he had misdirected himself and had failed to have regard to public access to Jubilee Gardens and (3) failure to make arrangements for a contiguency fund to safeguard the building in the event of a developer not being able to complete the work. CA dismissed the appeal. It was impossible to prove that the SoS had failed to consider DoE Circular 8/87 and the contigency fund fell outside the ambit of planning control. Public access to Jubilee Gardens was to be secured under a S106 agreement with covenants. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COUNTY HALL |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | HISTORIC BUILDINGS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | JUBILEE GARDENS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LONDON |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLANNING PERMISSION |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | REDEVELOPMENT |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS46812 | 59551-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |