Shephard and Love v SoS for the Environment and Ashford BC (Record no. 37658)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01495cab a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS47131 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1992 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u60905 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Shephard and Love v SoS for the Environment and Ashford BC |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1992 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Journal of Planning and Environment Law |
| Volume/sequential designation | 1992 JPL 827-832(6) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | QBD 5 November 1991. Appellants Shephard (S) and Love (L) appealed to the High Court under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s289 against enforcement notices alleging material change of use to a leisure plot. The land in question had been used for exercising and training horses for family use by previous owners. The present owners i.e the appellants continued to use the land for this purpose from 1974 until 1983. Thereafter, two caravans and huts were placed on the land for the two families use at weekends and holiday periods. H argued that the equestian and leisure plot use were both leisure plot activities and therefore a change of use had not taken place. The `Mansi` principle and "Murfitt v SOS" were considered. Held that the Inspector had applied the Murfitt principle correctly. Appeal failed. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ENFORCEMENT NOTICES |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | EQUESTIAN ACTIVITY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | LEISURE PLOT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MANSI PRINCIPLE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MURFITT V SOS |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS47131 | 60905-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |