Wycombe DC v Michael Shanly Group Ltd (Record no. 46532)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 01384cab a2200253 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | ABS50020 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 035 ## - SYSTEM CONTROL NUMBER | |
| System control number | (Sirsi) u73694 |
| 041 ## - LANGUAGE CODE | |
| Language code of text/sound track or separate title | eng |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Wycombe DC v Michael Shanly Group Ltd |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 1994 |
| 350 ## - PRICE (NR) (BK AM CF MU VM SE) [OBSOLETE] | |
| Price | 0 |
| 490 ## - SERIES STATEMENT | |
| Series statement | Estates Gazette |
| Volume/sequential designation | (1994) 02 EG 112-114(3) |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | QBD 12 July 1993. M was owner occupier of some land. He gave no express consent to the display of advertising hoardings on his land by X although there had been negotiations between them. On realising that X had erected the hoardings M removed them. It was concluded that the hoarding was erected without M`s knowledge or consent and M was not guilty of the offence of displaying an advertisement under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s224(5). W appealed on the grounds that not knowing about the advertisement was insufficient defence. Appeal dismissed citing "Merton LBC v Edmonds" (WB2926-35) which had held that not giving consent to an advertisement was a suitable defence under the Act. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ADVERTISING HOARDINGS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | ADVERTISEMENT REGULATIONS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | MERTON LBC V EDMONDS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | PLANNING CONTROL |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S224(5) |
| 690 ## - LOCAL SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM (OCLC, RLIN) | |
| Topical term or geographic name as entry element | PLANNING LAW AND PRACTICE-CASE LAW |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Suppress in OPAC | 0 |
| 948 ## - LOCAL PROCESSING INFORMATION (OCLC); SERIES PART DESIGNATOR (RLIN) | |
| c (OCLC) | 04/03/1997 |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total Checkouts | Full call number | Barcode | Date last seen | Copy number | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | London | London | Journal article | 14/09/1999 | ABS50020 | 73694-1001 | 06/08/2019 | 1 | 06/08/2019 | Law report |